From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,f3f3bded7ff60ce8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Alex R. Mosteo" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Memory profiling Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 18:27:29 +0200 Message-ID: <42974A71.7030708@mailinator.com> References: <429717E8.6030806@mailinator.com> <42974302.5080908@mailinator.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net ON1bi2E/k2qq9HRMQqy6fQpONiDFhPQPOIF5mEO46tafJPwLw= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <42974302.5080908@mailinator.com> Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11187 Date: 2005-05-27T18:27:29+02:00 List-Id: Alex R. Mosteo wrote: > And I just have recalled about gnatmem, silly me. Another thing I've recalled is that gnatmem may use humongous amounts of disk space when creating the dump file, and humongous amounts of memory when doing the post-mortem analysis. Valgrind seems a bit spartan so it may be a valid alternative.