From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,90108ed846e3f1bf
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!l39g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: christoph.grein@eurocopter.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Why constructing functions is a mess [was Language lawyer
	question: task activation
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 21:29:46 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <428cc0d4-78e6-4425-acf9-0b34a48aecce@l39g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <ccf8fc4b-80e3-4732-84e3-16c4e2d10c3d@v39g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
	<1wzjy9pzbft1m.1lut7nszfkzmp$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <49a95a12$0$31347$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
	<p2ugsc0q86gs.1wau2yijrzj7t.dlg@40tude.net>
 <49a97231$0$30236$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
	<1mjbcbequf1wz.1o3nwuz7oqteo.dlg@40tude.net>
 <49a984f6$0$30226$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
	<f7marceobkvv.gyibyusp603m$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <49ac0595$0$31344$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
	<1p6sf3ykej2ls.10jmdonrmif5h.dlg@40tude.net>
 <49ac2a8e$0$30232$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
	<7uqw8skbd6y0.ijm97ivq4kei.dlg@40tude.net>
 <7e0cb26f-3648-44ca-9241-9d0b7269e905@o11g2000yql.googlegroups.com>
	<bvs21rwcqtyz.upt3j8w0e76i$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <b53c3b94-0bd0-4607-abdd-ea41997a57f5@d19g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
	<49AD815A.6020608@obry.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.156.44.178
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1236144587 18757 127.0.0.1 (4 Mar 2009 05:29:47
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 05:29:47 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: l39g2000yqn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=80.156.44.178;
	posting-account=rmHyLAoAAADSQmMWJF0a_815Fdd96RDf
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1;
 .NET
	CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30;
 .NET CLR
	3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
X-HTTP-Via: 1.1 webwasher (Webwasher 6.8.3.4214)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4884
Date: 2009-03-03T21:29:46-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Mar 3, 8:13=A0pm, Pascal Obry <pas...@obry.net> wrote:
> You are using versions on different GCC backends (GCC 4.1 vs GCC 4.3).

So how can the backend influence the compilation of

   X: T2 :=3D (P1.T1 with null record);

being (illegally) accepted or (correctly) rejected?