From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,2b786abb8057cec1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Alex R. Mosteo" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GtkAda on WinXP Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 14:19:51 +0200 Message-ID: <427A0F67.9050704@mailinator.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net ayJLu+gw1idP0tNmmHBxeA5Dn3bWLiZKYwD06TORd50zFtCww= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:10931 Date: 2005-05-05T14:19:51+02:00 List-Id: Bart wrote: > (...) > And maybe this may be kind of weird but, is it possible to do something like > C�s fork(); in ADA? I�ve thought that Gtk.Main could be ran from a "child > process"... I�ve been working much more time with C than with ADA, so i Bear in mind that GtkAda for windows requires that all the Gtk calls be made from the same thread.