From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c3c4ae45442f569e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!infeed-2.proxad.net!news5-e.free.fr!not-for-mail
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 09:21:08 +0200
From: Lionel Draghi <Lionel.nospam.Draghi@Ada-France.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr-FR;
 rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050420 Debian/1.7.7-2
X-Accept-Language: fr-fr, en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada.Text_IO and protected objects (Was: [newbie question] tasks
 and protected types)
References: <1114747457.868019.93210@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
   <m23bt9dik6.fsf@hugin.crs4.it>   <42720DCD.6030304@mailinator.com>
   <m2y8b1bzdt.fsf@hugin.crs4.it>   <4272260d$0$30463$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be>
   <m2acnhn43i.fsf_-_@hugin.crs4.it>   <d4tftf$m7i$1@kda-news.kongsberg.com>
   <TYCdnS-rXKx5B-_fRVn-hg@megapath.net>
   <4272a5ce$0$15359$636a15ce@news.free.fr>
 <1114812712.786763.161730@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <1114812712.786763.161730@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <427331e3$0$15341$636a15ce@news.free.fr>
Organization: Guest of ProXad - France
NNTP-Posting-Date: 30 Apr 2005 09:21:07 MEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.236.216.140
X-Trace: 1114845667 news5-e.free.fr 15341 82.236.216.140:51916
X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:10847
Date: 2005-04-30T09:21:07+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

fabio de francesco a �crit :
...
> Isn't there in GCC/GNAT any options like "-pedantic" and "-ansi" in
> order to reject all programs that do not strictly follow the standard?

But non portable programs follows the standard, that's my point.
(Fortunatly, in the Ada world, not following the standard is not an option).

That's why you may write code that perfectly run with GNAT, unaware that 
it won't run that fine with another one.

-- 
Lionel