From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1fa85f3df5841ae1
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!fr.ip.ndsoftware.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!news.arcor.de!not-for-mail
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 21:05:28 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <bauhaus@futureapps.de>
Organization: future apps GmbH
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
 rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050324 Debian/1.7.6-1
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada.Containers.Vectors - querying multiple elements
References: <mailman.76.1114515863.24457.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
	<426e4c2b$0$7515$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net>
	<mailman.78.1114526397.24457.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
	<1114530273.185327.319710@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
	<1114531544.32583.142.camel@localhost.localdomain>	<426E72C3.9070108@on2.com>
 <mailman.84.1114541990.24457.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
In-Reply-To: <mailman.84.1114541990.24457.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <426e90ef$0$10506$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 Apr 2005 21:05:19 MEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 09a3216d.newsread4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=VaH3PUX37TgIeeCiY5g2Vc:ejgIfPPlddjW\KbG]kaMhliQbn6H@_EiD;Vf7eDR7^nUUng9_FXZ=c>:=P9Ihe`Bh@Z?dZ]MOide
X-Complaints-To: abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:10732
Date: 2005-04-26T21:05:19+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Duncan Sands wrote:

> But (IMHO) grabbing a "slice" of a
> vector is a very normal thing to want to do.  Why not support it as
> efficiently as possible?

I'm curious. Where is slicing a dynamically sized vector
done frequently?

-- Georg