From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,4c3a4cac2a77bb10 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Alex R. Mosteo" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: XMLAda dom document to string Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 11:32:24 +0200 Message-ID: <425F8A28.1030601@mailinator.com> References: <425CC45E.20404@mailinator.com> <425E1B1A.7020102@mailinator.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net f338jMv/QBX9uTHzVKUkZg4vMMnVRzpUFi6XevWyaQqLRGG+U= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:10490 Date: 2005-04-15T11:32:24+02:00 List-Id: Bj�rn Lundin wrote: > > > 2005-04-14 kl. 09.26 skrev Alex R. Mosteo: > > > About the license, it may be indeed that it must be GMGPL because > XML/Ada is. I copied/pasted the license block in the rest of my > original > code, but here we're talking about a modification of XML/Ada so I > presume I must maintain the original license (which I'm not interested > in modifying, I simply didn't thought of it until now). > > I presume that any modification introduced in the GPL such as the GMGPL > is propagated? I mean, Could someone provide a more restrictive license > for a derivative work? > > In any case I will reflect this change in the file license ASAP. > > > I looked at your cvs-site, but did not find it. > However, I then presume it is ok if I paste in the GMGPL into > Dom.Core.Nodes.Output ? I did forget to commit the change. It's now there, or paste it yourself if you prefer. > but be warned that it performs some pretty printing and by that > reason Windows-style new lines are embedded in the resulting > string. > > I can live with that. > > > There are too some chunks of whitespace for tabulating. That can add > quite some size. You may want to remove that too if the XML > generated is > never for human consumption. > > Well, it's not intended for humans, but it's fairly small documents > (less than 5 k) > so i'll keep it ,since it makes it easier to debug That's a point.