From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,64f0fb07a88662b1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Martin Dowie" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Contract checking in Ada Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 08:22:36 +0100 Organization: BAE SYSTEMS Message-ID: <424ba381$1_1@glkas0286.greenlnk.net> References: <424a9079$0$11482$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net> <0ux2e.4977$nP.4533@reader1.news.jippii.net> X-Trace: individual.net 0ob4fOqXXOyO+xLrxs3R5wFngu1nst788OxIjkxGkwQVub+urr X-Orig-Path: glkas0286.greenlnk.net!glkas0286!not-for-mail X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: glkas0286.greenlnk.net Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:10176 Date: 2005-03-31T08:22:36+01:00 List-Id: Martin Dowie wrote: > I don't know if Randy is refering to the AdaUK conference that Tucker > spoke at but - as far as I can recall - the vote went against them > there. Ok, found a like http://www.ada-auth.org/ai-files/grab_bag/adauk200y.zip Check slide 39. Compared to other proposed features pre/post & invariant were voted a lower priority by those attending (vast majority being users). These were the only votes where no one considered them high priority. I voted for both as 'medium' priority - I didn't buy into the idea that this would confuse people about SPARK. Cheers -- Martin