From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a24:2512:: with SMTP id
 g18-v6mr844208itg.37.1521590190471;
        Tue, 20 Mar 2018 16:56:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:29b8:: with SMTP id
 n53-v6mr1118294otb.11.1521590190045;
 Tue, 20 Mar 2018 16:56:30 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.unit0.net!peer02.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!u184-v6no773971ita.0!news-out.google.com!j10-v6ni407ite.0!nntp.google.com!u184-v6no773969ita.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 16:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <p8rhjh$e44$1@dont-email.me>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=85.240.221.202;
 posting-account=rhqvKAoAAABpikMmPHJSZh4400BboHwT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.240.221.202
References: <edf7b96a-f340-408c-994f-d5aa73b9f2db@googlegroups.com>
 <p8pe94$3pv$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk> <p8rhjh$e44$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <42387d28-c983-4e58-9522-815ccd1ad0fb@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: little precision about anonymous access types
From: Mehdi Saada <00120260a@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 23:56:30 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1380738200
X-Received-Bytes: 1701
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:51087
Date: 2018-03-20T16:56:29-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

It sounds interesting. Could you explain a bit more what effect you refer to ? Some code to show it ? Or a link to it.
For the time being, the few things I know is that anonymous types are useful and safe for : coextensions, and controlling access parameters/results and the dispatching they allow.
So if you allude to dispatching, I might understand your point (a bit), otherwise I don't.