From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,703c4f68db81387d
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,703c4f68db81387d
X-Google-Thread: 115aec,703c4f68db81387d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid109fba,gid115aec,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!proxad.net!newsfeed.stueberl.de!uucp.gnuu.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!news.arcor.de!not-for-mail
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 21:27:41 +0100
From: Georg Bauhaus <bauhaus@futureapps.de>
Organization: future apps GmbH
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
 rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050105 Debian/1.7.5-1
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++,comp.realtime
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Teaching new tricks to an old dog (C++ -->Ada)
References: <4229bad9$0$1019$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>
 <1110032222.447846.167060@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
 <871xau9nlh.fsf@insalien.org>
 <3SjWd.103128$Vf.3969241@news000.worldonline.dk>
 <87r7iu85lf.fsf@insalien.org> <1110052142.832650@athnrd02>
 <42309456$1@news.broadpark.no> <ow2Yd.21162$7U5.4617@fe04.lga>
 <opsnfw9nx75afhvo@localhost> <d0qiah$ep71@cui1.lmms.lmco.com>
 <pan.2005.03.11.18.01.45.684764@linuxchip.demon.co.uk.uk.uk>
 <d0sob3$3t5$1@s1.news.oleane.net>
 <4232ab3a$0$26547$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net>
 <pan.2005.03.14.14.41.47.813082@linuxchip.demon.co.uk.uk.uk>
 <d14co1$ca4$1@s1.news.oleane.net>
 <pan.2005.03.14.17.16.34.592520@linuxchip.demon.co.uk.uk.uk>
 <1110825790.396769@athnrd02>
 <pan.2005.03.14.19.27.46.488096@linuxchip.demon.co.uk.uk.uk>
 <1gf23j59mnsm2.wimnrcdrb09u.dlg@40tude.net>
In-Reply-To: <1gf23j59mnsm2.wimnrcdrb09u.dlg@40tude.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4235f336$0$26553$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 14 Mar 2005 21:25:26 MET
NNTP-Posting-Host: d41fb5bd.newsread4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=gWWRbRaU0\\>K]\3>m]<[U:ejgIfPPldTjW\KbG]kaMXGSi?jHD8GOP8[[m6mC?:\TUUng9_FXZ=S>:=P9Ihe`BX@Z?dZ]MOidU
X-Complaints-To: abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9386 comp.lang.c++:45653
 comp.realtime:1467
Date: 2005-03-14T21:25:26+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:

> It can be formulated in two words: "contract model" is what C++ templates
> lack.

I think "explicit contract model" is slightly better, and perhaps
you can say something about the closure that the compiler needs
to find out whether a contract is fulfilled (Can_Copy etc.)?
 

Georg