From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,703c4f68db81387d
X-Google-Thread: 115aec,703c4f68db81387d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid115aec,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!proxad.net!proxad.net!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!news.arcor.de!not-for-mail
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 11:37:25 +0100
From: Georg Bauhaus <sb463ba@user1.uni-duisburg.de>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.realtime
Subject: Re: 10 rules for benchmarking (was Re: Teaching new tricks to an
 old dog (C++ -->Ada))
References: <4229bad9$0$1019$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>
 <d0dkq6$781$1@titan.btinternet.com>
 <1110284070.410136.205090@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
 <395uqaF5rhu2mU1@individual.net> <112rs0bdr2aftdf@corp.supernews.com>
 <1inxxr988rxgg$.1w9dedak41k89.dlg@40tude.net>
 <112s1r0rf0o8nca@corp.supernews.com> <d0l2gq$egt$1@titan.btinternet.com>
 <112sonip5v4dca6@corp.supernews.com>
 <E1vXd.352556$w62.20389@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
 <112t3de6fu04f38@corp.supernews.com>
 <1110396477.596174.285520@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
 <112vb2t8eonuhed@corp.supernews.com>
 <1110422108.925127.54110@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
 <11329cb96h2p19f@corp.supernews.com> <c92s0d.vgk.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
 <113394jjvppao64@corp.supernews.com> <uk6oeaua9.fsf@obry.org>
 <1133s3qnmqmbjfb@corp.supernews.com>
 <4232a9f7$0$26552$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net>
 <11369p5jrcc6835@corp.supernews.com>
 <hhOYd.377323$w62.41621@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
 <1137falp86qhk89@corp.supernews.com>
In-Reply-To: <1137falp86qhk89@corp.supernews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <423417ab$0$1079$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 13 Mar 2005 11:36:27 MET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 47033680.newsread2.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=o:^iVRR[=hf:35lZDPnnTlQ5U85hF6f;djW\KbG]kaMhliQbn6H@_Eii?T;l5=k`Hh8JM^O\[iIdcc`=i_SY2=mb
X-Complaints-To: abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9304 comp.realtime:1416
Date: 2005-03-13T11:36:27+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

CTips wrote:

>>> void
>>> do_array(
>>>       int * x[N2]
>>>     )
>>> {

> - I want an array bounds check. Thats why the pointers are pointers to 
> unbounded arrays, and why there is a p[1].

Do you really get bounds checks for an array that
has an integer constant in its declarator?

$ como -A --c99 --optimize

doesn't show any speed difference when I play with the x
parameter in do_array().

Georg