From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Thread: 109fba,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Thread: 115aec,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Thread: f43e6,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid109fba,gid115aec,gidf43e6,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Alex R. Mosteo" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++,comp.realtime,comp.software-eng Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Teaching new tricks to an old dog (C++ -->Ada) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 13:22:28 +0100 Message-ID: <42318D84.1020401@mailinator.com> References: <4229bad9$0$1019$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <1110032222.447846.167060@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <871xau9nlh.fsf@insalien.org> <3SjWd.103128$Vf.3969241@news000.worldonline.dk> <87r7iu85lf.fsf@insalien.org> <1110052142.832650@athnrd02> <1lr611thktbau$.1dj95z21h7l5v.dlg@40tude.net> <97kpu5gkgo1r$.kc4nx7cxjziw$.dlg@40tude.net> <1110543138.32171@athnrd02> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net jGh7KKkKLveEAn0kkctINQ4zO8YDyUNLsOZXcCazgqGyTVhhI= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <1110543138.32171@athnrd02> Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9125 comp.lang.c++:45117 comp.realtime:1268 comp.software-eng:4834 Date: 2005-03-11T13:22:28+01:00 List-Id: Ioannis Vranos wrote: > Usually the stack is limited in comparison to the heap, and it sounds > strange to me that in Ada there is a large stack. My guess is that you > are using the heap for data storage implicitly(?) and you think you are > using the stack. Nope. And you can control in portable Ada how big the stack for a given task must be.