From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,703c4f68db81387d
X-Google-Thread: 115aec,703c4f68db81387d
X-Google-Thread: f43e6,703c4f68db81387d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid115aec,gidf43e6,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.enertel.nl!nntpfeed-01.ops.asmr-01.energis-idc.net!217.19.16.136.MISMATCH!feeder1.cambrium.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!skynet.be!newspost001!tjb!not-for-mail
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 17:48:15 +0100
From: Adrien Plisson <aplisson-news@stochastique.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: fr-fr, fr-be, fr, en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.realtime,comp.software-eng
Subject: Re: Teaching new tricks to an old dog (C++ -->Ada)
References: <4229bad9$0$1019$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>
 <1110032222.447846.167060@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
 <871xau9nlh.fsf@insalien.org>
 <3SjWd.103128$Vf.3969241@news000.worldonline.dk>
 <87r7iu85lf.fsf@insalien.org> <1110052142.832650@athnrd02>
 <d0dkq6$781$1@titan.btinternet.com>
 <1110284070.410136.205090@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
 <395uqaF5rhu2mU1@individual.net> <112rs0bdr2aftdf@corp.supernews.com>
 <1inxxr988rxgg$.1w9dedak41k89.dlg@40tude.net>
 <112s1r0rf0o8nca@corp.supernews.com> <d0l2gq$egt$1@titan.btinternet.com>
 <112sonip5v4dca6@corp.supernews.com>
 <E1vXd.352556$w62.20389@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
 <112t3de6fu04f38@corp.supernews.com> <uy8cxfap6.fsf@obry.org>
In-Reply-To: <uy8cxfap6.fsf@obry.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <422f28d2$0$18770$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be>
Organization: -= Belgacom Usenet Service =-
NNTP-Posting-Host: 0a07b4c8.news.skynet.be
X-Trace: 1110386898 news.skynet.be 18770 81.242.32.207:3265
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@skynet.be
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8949 comp.realtime:1139
 comp.software-eng:4697
Date: 2005-03-09T17:48:15+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Pascal Obry wrote:
> Why did they used all these fancy optimizations for intel C and GCC/C and
> not for GNAT/Ada!!!!!

btw, i looked at the specifications for the "threads" benchmark.

for me, it should output 2999 for N=3000. for the spec, it should 
output 3000. (3000 thread, the first gets 0 as a message and sends 1 
to the second thread, the seconds gets 1 and sends 2 to the third 
thread... the last thread just output the value it gets)

or i don't understand fully the spec, or the spec is wrong. in case 
the spec is wrong, it means that all implementations of this benchmark 
are wrong... so, those benchmarks become a little bit more dubious...

can anybody confirm this ?

-- 
rien