From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d65138770e3daae3
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.220.230 with SMTP id pz6mr17738441pbc.3.1340741290558;
        Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:08:10 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 l9ni23130pbj.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Keean Schupke <keean.schupke@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Refactoring for error: cannot inline "X" (forward instance within
 enclosing body)
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:06:33 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <422659c0-fef0-4daa-8bc6-ca94fa3a332b@googlegroups.com>
References: <7a18bc7e-2541-46f9-9d92-65d87fed06e6@googlegroups.com>
 <jsaf89$9a9$1@dont-email.me>
 <d651e7c9-e091-42a9-b56b-2502e6fab091@googlegroups.com>
 <4fe9859d$0$6553$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <2d7d1e52-4af4-493a-87cb-00f1e1740066@googlegroups.com>
 <55ac060b-09ee-4117-8d39-72f1a8b40c85@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.44.19.199
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1340741290 17193 127.0.0.1 (26 Jun 2012 20:08:10
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 20:08:10 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <55ac060b-09ee-4117-8d39-72f1a8b40c85@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.44.19.199;
 posting-account=T5Z2vAoAAAB8ExE3yV3f56dVATtEMNcM
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: 2012-06-26T13:06:33-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Tuesday, 26 June 2012 16:42:09 UTC+1, Keean Schupke  wrote:
> On Tuesday, 26 June 2012 12:53:35 UTC+1, Keean Schupke  wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 26 June 2012 10:49:23 UTC+1, Georg Bauhaus  wrote:
> > > On 26.06.12 09:51, Keean Schupke wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Here's the minimal test example (as minimal as I can make it so far...):
> > > 
> > > -gnatN makes this work.
> > 
> > 
> > Ah, -gnatN does not fix my project, so I need to produce an updated example.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Keean.
> 
> This example is simplified a bit more and still causes the problem with -gnatN.
> 
> 
> 
> procedure Test is
>     generic
>     package A is end;
> 
>     generic
>     package B is
>         procedure F;
>         pragma Inline_Always(F);
>     end B;
> 
>     package body B is
>         procedure F
>         is begin null;
>         end F;
>     end B;
> 
>     package C is
>         package My_A is new A;
>         package My_B is new B;
>     end C;
> begin
>     null;
> end Test;
> 
> 
> 
> The following compiles fine:
> 
> 
> 
> procedure Test is
>     generic
>     package A is end;
> 
>     generic
>     package B is
>         procedure F;
>         pragma Inline_Always(F);
>     end B;
> 
>     package body B is
>         procedure F
>         is begin null;
>         end F;
>     end B;
> 
>     package My_A is new A;
>     package My_B is new B;
> begin
>     null;
> end Test;
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Keean.


So the question is why does this compile without the "C" package? Can anyone explain to my why the compiler cannot inline when package "C" is there?


Cheers,
Keean.