From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,6c1607f3ce97ec9e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!proxad.net!infeed-2.proxad.net!news4-e.free.fr!not-for-mail Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:46:05 +0100 From: Lionel Draghi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr-FR; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041007 Debian/1.7.3-5 X-Accept-Language: fr-fr, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: A source code search engine References: <41e583b4$0$400$636a15ce@news.free.fr> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <41e6ec18$0$29882$636a15ce@news.free.fr> Organization: Guest of ProXad - France NNTP-Posting-Date: 13 Jan 2005 22:46:01 MET NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.65.98.83 X-Trace: 1105652761 news4-e.free.fr 29882 82.65.98.83:57688 X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7740 Date: 2005-01-13T22:46:01+01:00 List-Id: Frank J. Lhota a �crit : > This website is still in the Beta testing stage, and apparantly they need to > get some bugs out of the database. I was not able to locate ANY source code > on this site. For this stage of the beta testing, the site appears to be the > software equivalent of the Monty Python cheese shop sketch. > OK, so it seem's that I was the only one to have no problem with this site! :-) I tested it with "socket", "component", "Task_Identification", "GUI", and don't remember which other search. It works, and the source are well colourized. Other sources from the same project are available in the menu on the left. See for example this : http://www.koders.com/ada/fid574B57F47EC93CED098C13CF73CC24D4BA3A31D5.aspx?s=task_identification As far as I see, it's operational enough... -- Lionel