From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7b97e385047500eb
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!proxad.net!infeed-2.proxad.net!news4-e.free.fr!not-for-mail
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 01:02:53 +0100
From: Lionel Draghi <Lionel.nospam.Draghi@Ada-France.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr-FR;
 rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041007 Debian/1.7.3-5
X-Accept-Language: fr-fr, en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Experiences of XML parser generators for Ada?
References: <mailman.171.1102192671.10401.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
 <41b23f73$0$25049$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be>
 <41b79025$0$1333$636a15ce@news.free.fr> <x7vbrd17qm9.fsf@smaug.pushface.org>
In-Reply-To: <x7vbrd17qm9.fsf@smaug.pushface.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.0.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <41ba3938$0$12726$636a15ce@news.free.fr>
Organization: Guest of ProXad - France
NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Dec 2004 01:03:05 MET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.65.36.78
X-Trace: 1102723385 news4-e.free.fr 12726 82.65.36.78:32962
X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6889
Date: 2004-12-11T01:03:05+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Simon Wright a �crit :
...
>>    type Money is range 1 .. 10;
...
> I'm not familiar with this part of XML Schema, but it looks as though
> you could say
> 
> <xsd:simpleType name="money">
>   <xsd:restriction base="positiveInteger">
>     <xsd:minInclusive value="1"/>
>     <xsd:maxInclusive value="10"/>
>   </xsd:restriction>
> </xsd:simpleType>
OK. So I was wrong.

> (if you had the time to spare!)
Actually, I did not check the schema, because I don't intend to generate 
this by myself, or with one of those pretty tools available.
I just gave a look at a glance to ada2wsdl results.
ada2wsdl seems much more effective to me. But maybe it doesn't use the 
full WSDL semantics.

-- 
Lionel Draghi