From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, FREEMAIL_REPLY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,bf02c238a92156a3 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: "Alex R. Mosteo" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Windows Ada database support. Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 20:17:58 +0100 Message-ID: <41A4DE66.40500@mailinator.com> References: <5e3e03a7.0411240431.7e037a4e@posting.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de AhHAFgjpa6+0Jir0RPVQWgoyoy/5B8FYtL+FU82OK37fkAyUY= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6429 Date: 2004-11-24T20:17:58+01:00 List-Id: Pascal Obry wrote: > mark_doherty@yahoo.co.uk (Mark Doherty) writes: > > >>What is the current best advice. GNADE / CLAW / GWINDOWS.Database >>GNAVI, or something else? > > > I would go for GNADE. AFAIK this is the only one (on the list above, not > counting "something else" of course :) to run on GNU/Linux and Windows. I have > lot of good experiences with GNADE (using ODBC) on both GNU/Linux and Windows. And I'm using the GNADE PSQL binding and it's really easy.