From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e44790cdcea9da82
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From: "Alex R. Mosteo" <devnull@mailinator.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Problem with -gnatt
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 22:05:06 +0200
Message-ID: <4176C4F2.5090109@mailinator.com>
References: <mailman.39.1098278589.10401.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
 <umzyhbf5i.fsf@act-europe.fr> <41769112.2080703@mailinator.com>
 <uhdopbb0j.fsf@act-europe.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 0+rkTJnILOVAhQfBGSTI+AfF28qw2uKM8Ytn8V7mS7xng+RH8=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040913)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <uhdopbb0j.fsf@act-europe.fr>
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5544
Date: 2004-10-20T22:05:06+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Pascal Obry wrote:
> "Alex R. Mosteo" <devnull@mailinator.com> writes:
> 
> 
>>Whe are talking about no IO inside the protected subprograms, right? Nobody
>>prevents you to use another task to do IO. Or I'm missing something?
> 
> 
> Fine, and in this case you will have to leave the protected operation to let
> another one send/receive the data to/from a task. So we are back to 
> "for a short time" :)

The funny thing in this discussion is that I'm not doing IO in the 
protected procedure who raised the Matthew concerns. So we are here 
arguing about imprecise "short times" and non-existant one hour-long IOs :D