From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e44790cdcea9da82
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeeds.sol.net!posts.news.twtelecom.net!nnrp2.twtelecom.net!not-for-mail
From: "Matthew Heaney" <mheaney@on2.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <41651D37.4030805@mailinator.com>
 <c0a9d.3371$4b.445@trndny09><2skt9qF1ljjdtU1@uni-berlin.de>
 <4165472D.2030704@mailinator.com><416573FA.4010003@mailinator.com>
 <87k6u2mj08.fsf@insalien.org><4166538E.6090907@mailinator.com><41665fe4$1_1@baen1673807.greenlnk.net><41669198.80608@mailinator.com>
 <mailman.251.1097331456.390.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
Subject: Re: Problem with -gnatt
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 16:11:37 -0400
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
Message-ID: <41702c1d$0$91011$39cecf19@news.twtelecom.net>
Organization: Time-Warner Telecom
NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Oct 2004 19:59:25 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 7178acd9.news.twtelecom.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=\4U4C=NofgNM`dM`1WSIFFC_A=>8kQj6MhHXa^^g6TZDDFB78Rk0MABdYZAA8S:<l@Ce3hK;<m^;C
X-Complaints-To: abuse@twtelecom.net
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5295
Date: 2004-10-15T19:59:25+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"Stephen Leake" <stephen_leake@acm.org> wrote in message
news:mailman.251.1097331456.390.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org...
> "Alex R. Mosteo" <devnull@mailinator.com> writes:
>
> >
> > I've tried to make a reproducer with an empty program and the
> > instantiation, but then it works. ?
>
> Which supports the theory that it is simply a stack overflow.

One possibility is that whichever piece of code is using the hashed map is
calling Reserve_Capacity (or one of its older names, Set_Capacity or
Ensure_Capacity) with a very large value, and this raises Storage_Error
because the buckets array is too large.