From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,b74b00d13dd5feab X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!feeder2-1.proxad.net!news12-e.free.fr!not-for-mail Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 00:25:21 +0200 From: Lionel Draghi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr-FR; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041001 Debian/1.7.3-3 X-Accept-Language: en-us, it MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: testing with Ravenscar task References: <41671438$0$1122$626a14ce@news.free.fr> <41683E3F.1090209@nowhere.fi> In-Reply-To: <41683E3F.1090209@nowhere.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <41686531$0$6159$626a14ce@news.free.fr> Organization: Guest of ProXad - France NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Oct 2004 00:24:49 MEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.65.174.21 X-Trace: 1097360689 news12-e.free.fr 6159 82.65.174.21:38214 X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4968 Date: 2004-10-10T00:24:49+02:00 List-Id: Niklas Holsti wrote: ... > Ravenscar task bodies (at least those with just one suspension point) > can usually be made very simple by putting the real computation in a > procedure defined outside the task. This procedure can be unit-tested in > the normal way. I agree with you, Niklas. But what if I want to do some integration tests? Switching directly from unit tests stricto sensu to tests on the whole executable may be a big step. -- Lionel Draghi