From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,390580afe3b3407e,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From: "Alex R. Mosteo" <devnull@mailinator.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Resizing Charles Map
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:18:25 +0200
Message-ID: <415A9A01.9050909@mailinator.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1EkKlUPFbvLOtEdxt9yu8QBJDPNxvT588lIpcOnNJhr9vSLAI=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040913)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4373
Date: 2004-09-29T13:18:25+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Hi,

I'm using a Charles Map (Hashed strings) to hold a monotonic increasing 
collection of objects. It will contain thousands of them, and while the 
upper limit is unknown, I think that it rarely will reach, for example, 
a million. Is there something that makes not recommendable to issue a

Resize (Map, Natural'Last)

at start?