From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,XPRIO autolearn=ham
autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8af9e3a438ec928a,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
From: "P Hull"
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: process blocking
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 17:49:13 +1000
Organization: -
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
NNTP-Posting-Host: 220.244.246.241
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 220.244.246.241
Message-ID: <41400af9$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au>
X-Trace: dnews.tpgi.com.au!tpg.com.au 1094716153 220.244.246.241 (9 Sep 2004
17:49:13 +1000)
Path:
g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!fr.ip.ndsoftware.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!nntp.gblx.net!nntp3.phx1!dnews.tpgi.com.au!tpg.com.au!not-for-mail
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3529
Date: 2004-09-09T17:49:13+10:00
List-Id:
Hi, I know this is possible, but how does one go about having a process (p1)
siezing control of another process (pMain) such that no other process (p2,
p3, .. pn) is able to access pMain? I am guessing you define one channel and
maintain access to this channel? I have no idea how to implement such
blocking.
any help most appreciated
thanks
peter