From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,9a8c8a29d3e2d7c6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit From: "Ken Thomas" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <2n699dFta8mjU1@uni-berlin.de> <410e0ff0$1_1@baen1673807.greenlnk.net> <2n6j29Fso58dU1@uni-berlin.de> <410e4600_1@baen1673807.greenlnk.net> <61pug0lvubt8s0lj2dpd8vo37v9086qjkg@4ax.com> <410f891f$1_1@baen1673807.greenlnk.net> <80e1h0l3hofab47jphamslo3s8pkds1kl9@4ax.com> <6o1rec.hhr.ln@skymaster> <4111e11d$1_1@baen1673807.greenlnk.net> <4111ffd8_1@baen1673807.greenlnk.net> <411209ae$1_1@baen1673807.greenlnk.net> Subject: Re: Fortran Interface (Was:Re: [Ann] More Ada0Y packages for Ada95!) Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 09:21:21 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 NNTP-Posting-Host: tsunami.sesnet.soton.ac.uk Message-ID: <41133f84@news.ecs.soton.ac.uk> X-Trace: 6 Aug 2004 09:21:24 GMT, tsunami.sesnet.soton.ac.uk Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!feed3.jnfs.ja.net!feed1.jnfs.ja.net!jnfs.ja.net!news-spool.soton.ac.uk!news.ecs.soton.ac.uk!tsunami.sesnet.soton.ac.uk Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2597 Date: 2004-08-06T09:21:21+01:00 List-Id: One of the key features of Ada95 is the ability to interface languages such as Fortran and C. In my own domain of scientific computing there is a vast pool of reuseable components (BLAS, LAPACK, MPI,...) that can be used with advantage. Ada95 is a superb "gluing" language and it would a pity to lose this feature. Ken Thomas "Martin Dowie" wrote in message news:411209ae$1_1@baen1673807.greenlnk.net... > Martin Dowie wrote: > > Jean-Pierre Rosen wrote: > >> Yes. If you are serious about it, please get in touch with Jim Moore, > >> and make a proposal. I'm quite sure he would be delighted to present > >> it to WG9. We've been talking about Workshop agreements for a long > >> time, but never had (yet) an opportunity to start one... > > > > Do you have an email for Jim? > > Never mind - got it! :-) > >