From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,ab43ecf7e1a10743 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit From: "Frank" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: Subject: Re: Zero_Fill pragma Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 23:57:30 +0200 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 NNTP-Posting-Host: 74.80-202-223.nextgentel.com X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 74.80-202-223.nextgentel.com Message-ID: <40fd9553$1@news.broadpark.no> X-Trace: news.broadpark.no 1090360659 74.80-202-223.nextgentel.com (20 Jul 2004 23:57:39 +0200) Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!solnet.ch!solnet.ch!nntp.gblx.net!nntp3.phx1!news.broadpark.no Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2292 Date: 2004-07-20T23:57:30+02:00 List-Id: Hi Why a pragma? Why not use e.g the for-construction to say something like "others => False" Frank