From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1116ece181be1aea
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-09-08 17:19:13 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!snoopy.risq.qc.ca!chi1.webusenet.com!news.webusenet.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller2.gnilink.net!nwrdny02.gnilink.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030901 Thunderbird/0.2
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Is the Writing on the Wall for Ada?
References: <NGs6b.10770$Pa1.519789@read1.cgocable.net>
 <bebbba07.0309062059.6f225b06@posting.google.com>
 <FRz6b.2150$ej1.1502@nwrdny01.gnilink.net>
 <bebbba07.0309070324.1fe7ef69@posting.google.com>
 <3F5B8084.5080705@attbi.com>
 <bebbba07.0309071345.44e1f9a2@posting.google.com>
 <e2e5731a.0309081035.137cbdb3@posting.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <e2e5731a.0309081035.137cbdb3@posting.google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4097b.8256$w41.4532@nwrdny02.gnilink.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 00:19:12 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 162.84.176.54
X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net
X-Trace: nwrdny02.gnilink.net 1063066752 162.84.176.54 (Mon,
 08 Sep 2003 20:19:12 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 20:19:12 EDT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:42297
Date: 2003-09-09T00:19:12+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Alexander Kopilovitch wrote:
> Actually he did not say that much

Right. I just meant that in Java you do not entirely lose the
ability to separate specification from implementation, if you
approach the design in the right way.