From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AC_FROM_MANY_DOTS,BAYES_00
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,87135ae0055089bb
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-03-31 03:26:27 PST
From: "Egil H. H�vik" <egil.harald.hoevik@remove.this.kongsberg.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <slrnc6l7tq.nu.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de>
Subject: Re: Compiler bug or illegal code for entry_family?
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 13:26:34 +0200
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.71.174.124
Message-ID: <406aa7e0@193.71.169.73>
X-Trace: 31 Mar 2004 13:13:36 +0200, 193.71.174.124
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!uninett.no!news.eunet.no!193.71.169.73!193.71.174.124
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6689
Date: 2004-03-31T13:26:34+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"Lutz Donnerhacke" <lutz@iks-jena.de> wrote in message
news:slrnc6l7tq.nu.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de...
> procedure gnat_gigi_116 is
>
<snip>
>
> Should I submit a bug report or fix my code?

This is a bug, and has been fixed in newer versions of gnat
(at least in 3.16a1 and 5.01a)

> Obvious fix:

an even more obvious fix:

> procedure gnat_gigi_116 is
>    type Entries is range 1 .. 16;
>
>    protected type X is
        entry Call(Entries);
>    end X;
>
>    protected body X is
        entry Call(for e in Entries)
>       when True is
            i : Entries;
>       begin
            i := e;
>       end Call;
>    end X;
> begin
>    null;
> end gnat_gigi_116;


~egilhh