From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ADDR_WS, FROM_WSP_TRAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a73e561812bfa0d4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-08-15 05:04:53 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!small1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!in.100proofnews.com!in.100proofnews.com!nntp.infostrada.it!twister1.libero.it.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Marco Poggioli (a fake exposed name)" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: [GNAT commercial USE] -- can i use GNAT to develop a closed source commercial application ? Message-ID: <3uipjvoght3fbdcfqkdrsn9r50f8jeo7gc@4ax.com> References: X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 12:02:32 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 151.28.25.142 X-Complaints-To: abuse@libero.it X-Trace: twister1.libero.it 1060948952 151.28.25.142 (Fri, 15 Aug 2003 14:02:32 MET DST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 14:02:32 MET DST Organization: [Infostrada] Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:41497 Date: 2003-08-15T12:02:32+00:00 List-Id: On Fri, 15 Aug 2003 08:44:57 +0000 (UTC), Preben Randhol wrote: >> >> One last question comes in mind: is the free GNAT stable enough? > >> Can I trust it like if it were gcc C++ ? > >Depends what you mean by this. Which version etc... Personally I would >trust GNAT more than gcc C++. Besides the Ada language help catch much >more bugs than the C++ compiler. :-) > >Don't see why you cannot use Ada (and GNAT). Ok. Point taken. count one more on the Ada Bandwagon. Thanks all.