From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,e8023133274ae02c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!newspeer.monmouth.com!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!oleane.net!oleane!hunter.axlog.fr!nobody From: Jean-Pierre Rosen Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: procedural vs object oriented Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 11:17:58 +0200 Organization: Adalog Message-ID: <3sdn2e.b2d.ln@hunter.axlog.fr> References: <1146039364.130635.181590@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: mailhost.axlog.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: s1.news.oleane.net 1146045665 24884 195.25.228.57 (26 Apr 2006 10:01:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@oleane.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 10:01:05 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) In-Reply-To: <1146039364.130635.181590@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com> Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:3932 Date: 2006-04-26T11:17:58+02:00 List-Id: Ananth the Boss a �crit : > i am working in Ada based flight software development project.as a > means of improving i took to the CASE tool based development.ours is a > procedural approach of development.but the commercial CASE tools speak > a lot about class/object/UML.how will this suit for procedure oriented > development where we dont have necessity to identify classes and do > detailed design as mentioned in OO aproach > There is no sin in not being object-oriented, it all depends on your needs. Especially in real-time, procedural approaches are often better when ensuring WCET is important. UML is an object oriented approach, and is not appropriate for procedural development. Other tools supporting SART for example might be more appropriate. The need must be lead the choice of the tool, not the other way round! -- --------------------------------------------------------- J-P. Rosen (rosen@adalog.fr) Visit Adalog's web site at http://www.adalog.fr