From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,33ed4ca582c945fc X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.germany.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Subject: Re: Limited returns Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de Organization: cbb software GmbH References: <304d62f5-53eb-4ec2-bcd5-a84ac8f9fe60@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 18:53:57 +0200 Message-ID: <3pwjng4q8sde.mh4dkauvjpxt.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Date: 23 Jun 2008 18:54:01 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: b1eaa0fa.newsspool2.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=O]IUd[BP]]B2jYf>V4L0gLA9EHlD;3YcB4Fo<]lROoRA8kF On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 08:20:51 -0700 (PDT), fedya_fedyakoff@inbox.ru wrote: >> Crashed pretty badly with CONSTRAINT_ERROR, whining about tag check >> error. > > though i can't fugure out how it could check that in compile time... > can it? Even if it could, that would not make the program illegal. The compiler could only warn you about a possible exception propagation, which is not an error. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de