From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,9983e856ed268154 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.204.10.88 with SMTP id o24mr134396bko.0.1345717607776; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 03:26:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.24.165 with SMTP id v5mr222495wif.1.1345717607341; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 03:26:47 -0700 (PDT) Path: m12ni128777bkm.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!7no38589115wig.0!news-out.google.com!n2ni273884018win.0!nntp.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!194.109.133.85.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!news2.euro.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!gegeweb.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Should Inline be private in the private part of a package spec? Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 12:27:03 +0200 Organization: cbb software GmbH Message-ID: <3ovjseci3jkm.vkwl0h05ceuj.dlg@40tude.net> References: <50353a25$0$6581$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <1x29v2l5crksa$.17qggd3ghy94c$.dlg@40tude.net> <746632025367360149.847942rm-host.bauhaus-maps.arcor.de@news.arcor.de> <19yh6raqplxd9$.ubx1vlm6le9i.dlg@40tude.net> <5035e4f9$0$6572$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <1dt9qbimr88yf$.1rx3ijvu1okdr$.dlg@40tude.net> <5035fec0$0$6566$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de NNTP-Posting-Host: FbOMkhMtVLVmu7IwBnt1tw.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: 2012-08-23T12:27:03+02:00 List-Id: On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 11:58:24 +0200, Georg Bauhaus wrote: > On 23.08.12 10:38, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > >> The point is straight and simple: when you are free to choose never ever >> use XML. There is no technical reason to choose XML. > > For weeks now I have been trying to explain that in my networks, For weeks your are trying to explain how wrong decisions led or might lead to XML. I don't argue with that. I merely state that neither of these decisions could be necessary due to technical reasons. Human error /= technical reason -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de