From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,60e2922351e0e780
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-16 13:04:47 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!small1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nntp.gbronline.com!news.gbronline.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 15:04:43 -0600
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 16:04:48 -0500
From: Wes Groleau <groleau@freeshell.org>
Reply-To: groleau@freeshell.org
Organization: Ain't no organization here!
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US;
 rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, es-mx, pt-br, fr-ca
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Clause "with and use"
References: <bebbba07.0311081140.e0e94e6@posting.google.com>
 <bebbba07.0311102320.7fba665a@posting.google.com>
 <slrnbr17j1.1qo.randhol+valid for reply from news@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <boq8bm$1g79l6$1@ID-175126.news.uni-berlin.de>
 <bebbba07.0311111235.e74c902@posting.google.com>
 <bormns$1i4d87$1@ID-175126.news.uni-berlin.de>
 <3FB1609E.D56E315C@fakeaddress.nil>
 <borog2$1fpdhl$1@ID-175126.news.uni-berlin.de>
 <bebbba07.0311122326.690bd121@posting.google.com>
 <bp0nqn$afi$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu>
 <bebbba07.0311132145.58a4541e@posting.google.com>
 <bp22op$1ltd$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu> <3FB65716.85E1F775@fakeaddress.nil>
 <1IKdnYIxfIidWSui4p2dnA@comcast.com> <Ld6dndjIC6BKTSuiRVn-uA@gbronline.com>
 <3FB790ED.AE992406@fakeaddress.nil>
In-Reply-To: <3FB790ED.AE992406@fakeaddress.nil>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <3oqdndoBdoPxeyqiRVn-iw@gbronline.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.9.86.45
X-Trace: 
 sv3-4042YZxV/q0WPcZ3CoOv/Wppo2dab/J/+rMyjbnXo5NAPB6/YXTaXUBuLjvlirDYIiueJV+luf79cKu!46pC5vWc7FWx7v+EtOt5cPMDRziVGbh77GI0K6MpsKeIybBHVg+cXfShYvEoHRsQfW3+6YJ30qRp
X-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
 properly
X-Postfilter: 1.1
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2549
Date: 2003-11-16T16:04:48-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Gautier Write-only wrote:
> I'm curious to know who's right on the changed example: GNAT or ObjectAda ?
> GNAT compiles, OA says:
> 
> outer.adb: Error: line 1 col 6 LRM:4.1(3), Direct name, Outer, is not visible, Ignoring future references 

I'm curious too.  I'm tempted to say OA is wrong.
I remember once having Verdix refuse to allow referencing

    Proc.Vrbl

within the body of Proc.Func

and that was ruled a bug.

-- 
Wes Groleau
    "Would the prodigal have gone home if
     the elder brother was running the farm?"
                       -- James Jordan