From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,97482af7429a6a62 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 10d15b,97482af7429a6a62 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d15b,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,97482af7429a6a62 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Curtis Bass Subject: Re: C++ not OOP? (Was: Language Efficiency Date: 1995/04/21 Message-ID: <3n8so9$lgq@atlantis.utmb.edu>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 101369046 references: <3mbmd5$s06@icebox.mfltd.co.uk> <3mcfbf$psl@acmez.gatech.edu> <3mgnkc$e3j@atlantis.utmb.edu> <1995Apr13.180317.3308@rcmcon.com> <3muaif$46u@atlantis.utmb.edu> <1995Apr21.181149.6783@rcmcon.com> organization: Office of Academic Computing newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.cobol Date: 1995-04-21T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: rmartin@rcmcon.com (Robert Martin) wrote: -- [post deleted] -- This is degenerating into testosterone-crazed posturing. All I did was correctly answer someone's question. Why do you get offended at this? Why do you strut around, trying to say that YOUR view of the world is "better" than mine? For the record, Grady Booch calls Smalltalk a "pure" OOPL. Frankly, I prefer to adopt his view of the world rather than yours. > Robert Martin | Design Consulting | Training courses offered: Curtis Bass