From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,97482af7429a6a62 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 10d15b,97482af7429a6a62 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d15b,public X-Google-Thread: 10a640,9ca80649c409e17e X-Google-Attributes: gid10a640,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,97482af7429a6a62 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,371d317eff97da58 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public From: matomira@di.epfl.ch (Fernando Mato Mira) Subject: Re: C++ not OOP? (Was: Language Efficiency Date: 1995/04/21 Message-ID: <3n8rjd$90a@disunms.epfl.ch>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 101368879 distribution: world references: <3mbmd5$s06@icebox.mfltd.co.uk> <3n8jdv$jer@watnews1.watson.ibm.com> content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 organization: Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.object,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.cobol,comp.lang.clos Date: 1995-04-21T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <3n8jdv$jer@watnews1.watson.ibm.com>, ncohen@watson.ibm.com (Norman H. Cohen) writes: > It should be noted that even in languages without direct linguistic > support for multiple dispatch, the same effect can be achieved in a > straightforward way by redispatching. Of course. And you can achieve the same effect as single-dispatch by using function pointers in a C program.. -- F.D. Mato Mira http://ligwww.epfl.ch/matomira.html Computer Graphics Lab matomira@epfl.ch EPFL FAX: +41 (21) 693-5328