From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,319ef0454c7765d5
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: l107353@cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com (Garlington KE)
Subject: Re: Why no exception hierarchy ?
Date: 1995/04/07
Message-ID: <3m41am$grt@butch.lmsc.lockheed.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 100070400
references: <3ksv4s$f9e@news.uni-c.dk>
 <gauthier-2403951115540001@164.81.60.62> <D645uH.Dqr@nntpa.cb.att.com>
 <1995Mar28.115614.9511@eisner> <3ls5sb$nl8@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
 <ichbiah.271.2F82D56D@jdi.tiac.net> <dewar.797220950@schonberg>
organization: Lockheed Missiles and Space Co.
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1995-04-07T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Robert Dewar (dewar@cs.nyu.edu) wrote:
: So if you ask what is standard Ada, the only existing standards for Ada
: are for the new version, which we call Ada 95.

Although, to be fair, it is still valid to reference MIL-STD-1815(A) if
you work for the good old US DOD.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Ken Garlington                  GarlingtonKE@lfwc.lockheed.com
F-22 Computer Resources         Lockheed Fort Worth Co.

If LFWC or the F-22 program has any opinions, they aren't telling me.