From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,319ef0454c7765d5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: ncohen@watson.ibm.com (Norman H. Cohen) Subject: Re: Why no exception hierarchy ? Date: 1995/04/07 Message-ID: <3m3khf$ngk@watnews1.watson.ibm.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 100070390 distribution: world references: <3ksv4s$f9e@news.uni-c.dk> <1995Mar28.115614.9511@eisner> <3ls5sb$nl8@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> organization: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center reply-to: ncohen@watson.ibm.com newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1995-04-07T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes: |> Note that the copies of RM 6.0 recently mailed out by the Ada 9X |> project office are NOT official copies of the standard (you can tell by |> the paragraph numbers, paragraph numbers are not allowed in ISO standards). The following special Competitive Upgrade Offer from ISO is good only during the first week of april: For a fraction of the cost of an official ISO standard, they will send you an Upgrade Kit, consisting of a bottle of opaquing fluid that you can use to hide the paragraph numbers in RM 6.0. -- Norman H. Cohen ncohen@watson.ibm.com