From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,cf34599caf2fa938
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: cjames@stout.entertain.com (Colin James III)
Subject: Re: GNAT function calling overhead
Date: 1995/04/07
Message-ID: <3m3aia$7u9@stout.entertain.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 100070332
references: <3m0nv1$pv2@nef.ens.fr> <D6nA9u.Hq7@nntpa.cb.att.com>
organization: A poorly-installed InterNetNews site
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1995-04-07T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <D6nA9u.Hq7@nntpa.cb.att.com>,
Kenneth Almquist <ka@socrates.hr.att.com> wrote:
>
>I hope that GNAT funding will cover a bunch of performance tunin ...
>				Kenneth Almquist

In about April, 1994 (one year ago) at a FRAWG meeting, I believe it was 
General Little, before he retired, answered my question of whether 
GNAT would be funded said, "No, no more money for GNAT".

If ACT goes public, maybe you could buy stock in that "hope".