From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,13d6cd0af0d0d769 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: progers@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM (Pat Rogers) Subject: Re: Does memory leak? Date: 1995/04/05 Message-ID: <3luek0$18s@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 100939357 references: <3kopao$ekg@nef.ens.fr> <3l6gf6$h05@theopolis.orl.mmc.com> <3ls2ku$qls@hacgate2.hac.com> organization: NeoSoft Internet Services +1 713 968 5800 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1995-04-05T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <3ls2ku$qls@hacgate2.hac.com>, John Baker wrote: > >The Lisp i programmed in (symbolics) had a really nice feature -- >allocation to *named* areas of memory. You could allocate >objects with differing life spans in different areas and then >(at the appropriate time), wipe a whole named area and start over >without having to destroy the objects individually. Very fast >and easy to control. I'd like to see a feature like that in C++ >and ADA. Piece of cake using Pools in Ada95. For that matter, using the Booch Components (version '95) that should be directly supportable on a per- component basis. -- Pat Rogers progers@acm.org