From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,319ef0454c7765d5
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Why no exception hierarchy ?
Date: 1995/04/04
Message-ID: <3ls5sb$nl8@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 100815584
references: <3ksv4s$f9e@news.uni-c.dk>
 <gauthier-2403951115540001@164.81.60.62> <D645uH.Dqr@nntpa.cb.att.com>
 <1995Mar28.115614.9511@eisner>
organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1995-04-04T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

pragma Atomic is in Ada 85, it is not found in the obsolete language defined
by the previous standard.

Seriously, we should from now on consider on this newsgroup that Ada means
Ada 95 by default. If people want to ask questions or make comments about
Ada 83 they should be careful to specify that this is what they are talking
about.