From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,aec2c5631508f2aa,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: casioa@bah.com
Subject: Ada Windows compilers
Date: 1995/04/04
Message-ID: <3lrvub$np7@booz.bah.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 100815579
organization: Booz-Allen & Hamillton
content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1995-04-04T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


I used Aetech's Integrada for windows last year and was not impressed; it was 
buggy and just didn't work very well. I have long used Alsys' PC Ada compilers 
and am wondering if their ActivAda is just a re-packaged Integrada, or is it 
indeed as robust as their PC compilers? 

Also, I would welcome any critical feedback on other Ada windows compilers. 
I've tried Meridian's and didn't like it either.