From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,97482af7429a6a62
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 10d15b,97482af7429a6a62
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d15b,public
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,97482af7429a6a62
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
From: bb206@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Harold P Zbiegien)
Subject: Re: Language Efficiency
Date: 1995/04/04
Message-ID: <3lrrqk$kbj@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 100814127
references: <3lmt64$stt@dplanet.p2k.cbis.com>
organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
reply-to: bb206@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Harold P Zbiegien)
newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.cobol
Date: 1995-04-04T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In a previous article, robertb@cbis.com (Robert C. Bethel) says:

>Anyone know of research papers that deal with the subject
>of language efficiency? By efficiency I mean the quality
>of machine binaries (code space, execution time, etc.)
>given an identical program coded in several languages.
>
>Thanks 
>--
>Robert.Bethel@CBIS.Com 
>
Shouldn't this be labeled "compiler efficiency"  There may not be anything
inherent between the efficiency of one language and another, but there sure
is differences between the generated code coming out of compilers.

Harold
American Greetings Corp.
A

D
C
C
A
C
Harold