From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, LOTS_OF_MONEY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,351a870003c36448 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: mfeldman@seas.gwu.edu (Michael Feldman) Subject: Re: ISO standards (see Ada95 chpt. 1.2) Date: 1995/04/04 Message-ID: <3lri6q$9en@felix.seas.gwu.edu>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 100815547 references: <1995Mar30.204804.33330@ocsystems.com> <3lplqn$12p1@watnews1.watson.ibm.com> organization: George Washington University newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1995-04-04T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <3lplqn$12p1@watnews1.watson.ibm.com>, Norman H. Cohen wrote: >Some interesting statistics computed from Ivan's data: >Language standard $US Pages $US/Page > Fortran $224 369 0.61 > COBOL $13 1 13.00 > Ada $266 511 0.52 > C $166 219 0.76 >Clear evidence that Ada is the most cost-effective language! >;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) You're absolutely right, Norm. I especially like the COBOL standard. COBOL must be a _very_ concise language. :-) Actually, for $39.95, one can pick up a copy of the Ada CD-ROM set, which has all the Ada documents - LRM, Rationale, etc. etc., in PostScript, ASCII, and HTML. Now THAT's cost-effective.. :-) Ada is the only language for which the standard is, and will remain, available free in electronic form. Mike Feldman