From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,405c9fed403b342b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-12-22 06:37:52 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!chcgil2-snh1.gtei.net!news.bbnplanet.com!wn11feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!attbi_s04.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Steve" <nospam_steved94@comcast.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <1b585154.0312211634.6c414d2e@posting.google.com>
Subject: Re: Program Terminates ...
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Message-ID: <3lDFb.627904$Fm2.565052@attbi_s04>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.211.58.135
X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net
X-Trace: attbi_s04 1072103871 12.211.58.135 (Mon, 22 Dec 2003 14:37:51 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 14:37:51 GMT
Organization: Comcast Online
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 14:37:51 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3694
Date: 2003-12-22T14:37:51+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

You might try adding a delay after each of the Put_Line statements in the
exception handlers.  Maybe the program is getting killed before the message
makes its way out.

I have seen this type of termination before, usually not with Ada.  I have
been known resort to saving state information about each task in shared
memory so I could see where things were when the program died.

Steve
(The Duck)

"Peter Richtmyer" <prichtmyer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1b585154.0312211634.6c414d2e@posting.google.com...
> I hope someone can help.
>
> I am running a couple programs using
> Gnat 3.15p on Win2000. One program has a number of tasks that
> all have exception handlers. Virtually all my routines have
> exception handlers too.
>
> After running awhile (the two programs exchange
> messages) the one program terminates gracefully - for no
> apparent reason. Eventually all the tasks seem to terminate,
> though I have not coded any normal way out of some of them
> (endless loops).  And I have "Put_Line" statements in all
> exception handlers and at the end of the main program.
> But no error messages are printed. (Other "normal" messages
> are printed during the run.)
>
> Is there some resource that could be used up and yet not cause
> an exception? Or what would cause this behavior? I have never
> seen anything like this before, and I've been at it some years.
> Any ideas very welcome. It is deadline time!
>
> Thanks,
> Peter