From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,cc4a1f5e11494cc9
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-03-28 11:18:54 PST
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!stern.fokus.gmd.de!ceres.fokus.gmd.de!zib-berlin.de!news.mathworks.com!hookup!lamarck.sura.net!ns1.sw-eng.falls-church.va.us!ns1.sw-eng.falls-church.va.us!not-for-mail
From: brashear@ns1.sw-eng.falls-church.va.us (Philip Brashear)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT and subunits
Date: 28 Mar 1995 07:58:25 -0500
Organization: None
Message-ID: <3l915h$hud@ns1.sw-eng.falls-church.va.us>
References: <3l6j48$82t@ns1.sw-eng.falls-church.va.us>
 <3l79nr$nnt@felix.seas.gwu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ns1.sw-eng.falls-church.va.us
Date: 1995-03-28T07:58:25-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <3l79nr$nnt@felix.seas.gwu.edu>,
Michael Feldman <mfeldman@seas.gwu.edu> wrote:
>
...
>
>Did you just re-_link_, or go back through the GNAT binder? Given that
>GNAT is more "open" than many other compilers, you can end-run 
>the binding process very easily. If you went through the binder, and
>were not asked to re-compile the parent package body, I think this is a
>serious bug.                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
...

I used the "gnatbl" command to invoke the GNAT binder.  BTW, I had a
(main) PROCEDURE (not a package) with a subunit that was also a procedure.
I don't think this would make any difference.

Phil