From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f41074d3f38aa459
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-03-28 02:07:24 PST
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!stern.fokus.gmd.de!ceres.fokus.gmd.de!zib-berlin.de!Germany.EU.net!wizard.pn.com!satisfied.apocalypse.org!news.mathworks.com!zombie.ncsc.mil!admii!cmcl2!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!nobody
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Where's Aetech?
Date: 27 Mar 1995 21:50:59 -0500
Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
Message-ID: <3l7tij$ehh@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
References: <1995Mar23.165030.643@nosc.mil> <3kvksa$se8@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM>
 <SRCTRAN.95Mar26113150@world.std.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: gnat.cs.nyu.edu
Date: 1995-03-27T21:50:59-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Greg, I am not so sure that it is fair to blame GNAT for "driving AETech
into the ground". Actually I have been a little surprised that AETech did
not take advantage of GNAT, their main product was, as I understand things,
a nice Windows environment for Ada compilers, and I see no reason why that
should not have been married with GNAT, it sounds like an effective
combination to me, but oh well ...