From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,efe03f20164a417b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-03-28 00:14:30 PST
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!stern.fokus.gmd.de!ceres.fokus.gmd.de!zib-berlin.de!Germany.EU.net!wizard.pn.com!satisfied.apocalypse.org!news.mathworks.com!zombie.ncsc.mil!admii!cmcl2!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!nobody
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: An observation of Ada (may offend)
Date: 27 Mar 1995 18:16:55 -0500
Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
Message-ID: <3l7h17$9br@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
References: <3kbkm1$41o@miranda.gmrc.gecm.com>
   <3kcflv$164a@watnews1.watson.ibm.com>
   <EACHUS.95Mar20111527@spectre.mitre.org>
   <3knah2$p4m@watnews1.watson.ibm.com> <3kr20s$gqq@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
   <EACHUS.95Mar23113811@spectre.mitre.org>  <3l1lkq$pm6@gnat.csn
 <3l2o9a$3a1@infomatch.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: gnat.cs.nyu.edu
Date: 1995-03-27T18:16:55-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I don't much like pragma Restrictions (No_Child_Units), since this is a
configuration pragma, and the idea of restricting child units completely
is not what this is about, yes, I know that such a pragma can be applied
to one unit, but I still don't like it!