From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d3b2e17058959a22
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-03-27 06:58:48 PST
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!Germany.EU.net!EU.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!portal.austin.ibm.com!bocanews.bocaraton.ibm.com!watnews.watson.ibm.com!ncohen
From: ncohen@watson.ibm.com (Norman H. Cohen)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: C++ to Ada95, help please
Date: 27 Mar 1995 14:58:48 GMT
Organization: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <3l6jr8$12kj@watnews1.watson.ibm.com>
References: <3kjd2m$d3t@jerry.rb.icl.co.uk> <D5tIGu.Cn6@inmet.camb.inmet.com>
 <D5w7z1.8n5@ss3.magec.com> <3kvdai$kjk@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
Reply-To: ncohen@watson.ibm.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: rios8.watson.ibm.com
Date: 1995-03-27T14:58:48+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <3kvdai$kjk@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>, dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes: 
|> Why wasn't pragma Unchecked_Union included in Ada 95?
|>
|> Really two reasons: 
|>
|> First: ...
|>
|> Second: ...
|>
|> Third (3 of 2 :-) ...

There are three kinds of people in this world:  Those who know how to
count and those who don't.

--
Norman H. Cohen    ncohen@watson.ibm.com