From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,efe03f20164a417b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-03-25 21:30:01 PST
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!news.rwth-aachen.de!news.rhrz.uni-bonn.de!news.uni-stuttgart.de!rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!news.alpha.net!news.mathworks.com!zombie.ncsc.mil!admii!cmcl2!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!nobody
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: An observation of Ada (may offend)
Date: 25 Mar 1995 23:03:33 -0500
Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
Message-ID: <3l2p2l$elj@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
References: <3kbkm1$41o@miranda.gmrc.gecm.com>
 <3kcflv$164a@watnews1.watson.ibm.com>
 <EACHUS.95Mar23113811@spectre.mitre.org>
 <3ku7us$117l@info4.rus.uni-stuttgart.de> <3kutd3$ngi@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM>
NNTP-Posting-Host: gnat.cs.nyu.edu
Date: 1995-03-25T23:03:33-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Maybe this discussion [about pragma No_Child_Units] should migrate to the
MRT list"

I think definitely NOT, I would hate to see the MRT list cluttered up with
discussions of possible extensions etc. It should be reserved strictly for
discussing Ada 95 as it is.

It is incidentally quite easy to thwart pragma No_Child_Units; just edit
the line out of the source. As I noted in my original response, your
CM may prevent this, but if it is clever enough to do that, why can't
it be a little more clever and control fhild units.