From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,fb904ed5b1bd56bb
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-03-22 07:02:34 PST
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!news.rwth-aachen.de!news.rhrz.uni-bonn.de!RRZ.Uni-Koeln.DE!uni-duisburg.de!zib-berlin.de!Germany.EU.net!Munich.Germany.EU.net!ibm.de!aixssc.uk.ibm.com!watnews.watson.ibm.com!ncohen
From: ncohen@watson.ibm.com (Norman H. Cohen)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Differences between RM 5.0 and 6.0
Date: 22 Mar 1995 15:02:34 GMT
Organization: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <3kpe6a$15is@watnews1.watson.ibm.com>
References: <Mats.Weber-2003952132250001@mlma11.matrix.ch>
Reply-To: ncohen@watson.ibm.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: rios8.watson.ibm.com
Date: 1995-03-22T15:02:34+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <Mats.Weber-2003952132250001@mlma11.matrix.ch>,
Mats.Weber@matrix.ch (Mats Weber) writes: 

|> I have a paper copy of version 5.0 of the Ada 95 RM. Can I use it safely

Only if you keep it away from an open flame.

|> or are there many changes from 5.0 to 6.0 (the standard) ?

But seriously, folks:  Changes include the treatment of children of
generics, the addition of predefined packages like Ada.Integer_Text_IO,
and changing Ada.Strings.Constants to Ada.Strings.Maps.Constants.  At
least the first two of these changes occurred after version 5.7.

Since you are already familiar with the general shape of Ada 95, I
presume you want to use the RM as a reference to look up details, so I
would definitely suggest getting the final version.

--
Norman H. Cohen    ncohen@watson.ibm.com