From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f28dd1d63a9466b2
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-03-19 15:26:56 PST
Path: 
 bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!hookup!solaris.cc.vt.edu!news.duke.edu!zombie.ncsc.mil!admii!cmcl2!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!nobody
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Syntax question
Date: 19 Mar 1995 15:53:03 -0500
Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
Message-ID: <3ki5jf$fc7@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
References: <3jt25s$dim@felix.seas.gwu.edu><3k7t8o$4pt@hacgate2.hac.com>
 <3kb7ji$8ot@hydra.Helsinki.FI>
NNTP-Posting-Host: gnat.cs.nyu.edu
Date: 1995-03-19T15:53:03-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Of course Niklas, we have to ask, if you always use named notation, then
why on earth would you make a maintenance change altering the order of
parameters and forcing recompilation of all the clients :-)