From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f28dd1d63a9466b2
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-03-18 18:01:57 PST
Path: 
 bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!gatech!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!panix!cmcl2!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!nobody
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Syntax question
Date: 18 Mar 1995 20:04:21 -0500
Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
Message-ID: <3kfvul$eec@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
References: <3jt25s$dim@felix.seas.gwu.edu> <3k7t8o$4pt@hacgate2.hac.com>
 <3k87i7$q7g@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM>
NNTP-Posting-Host: gnat.cs.nyu.edu
Date: 1995-03-18T20:04:21-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"It does, too!  All you hafta do is add another member function with
the new parameter list.  After that, all it is is just another
recompile :-)"

David says, complaining that it is unfair to criticize C++ for not
having default parameters.

You haven't seen some of the complex parameter lists I have! Either that
or 2**K different member functions for large values of K doesn't worry
you!