From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4703f78b21b2c841
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-03-11 08:46:46 PST
Path: 
 bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: pug156@aol.com (Pug 156)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: WTB: DOS ADA Compiler
Date: 11 Mar 1995 11:38:26 -0500
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com
Message-ID: <3jsjm2$4tg@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
References: <3jpnf4$a13@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
Reply-To: pug156@aol.com (Pug 156)
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com
Date: 1995-03-11T11:38:26-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I believe that using GNU NYU Ada Translator (GNAT) would be good, as the
'gcc' used with the 'gnat' extension would give you both an Ada 95
compiler (early Beta version) with a Modula 2 compiler.

If you read some of the GNAT propaganda, you'll find that you might be
able to extend your product in Ada, leaving large parts of it in its
current Modula 2 form.  The 'gcc' tool also supports C, C++, and (I think)
FORTRAN.  These are more stable than the GNAT part, so you could start now
in some C++ and switch to Ada 95 later.  I read something on the GNU run
time system.  If your careful during the link phase, a program written in
all three languages should not have any problems.